The Ultimate Authority on the Takata Airbag Settlement

introduction

Contact Takata Airbag Lawyer Timothy L. Miles if you were injured by a defective Takata airbag now

The automotive industry faced an unprecedented challenge when it was discovered that airbags manufactured by Takata Corporation posed a severe safety risk to vehicle occupants. These airbags, installed in numerous makes and models across multiple car manufacturers, had the potential to deploy with excessive force, causing injury or even death to vehicle occupants. The ensuing recall campaign, legal proceedings, and settlement process have been complex and far-reaching.

The legal proceedings surrounding the Takata airbag crisis were multifaceted and complex, involving various jurisdictions, types of lawsuits, and legal strategies. We will explore intricate legal landscape that ultimately led to the Takata airbag settlement.

If you or a loved one have been injured by a defective Takata airbag, you have the right to pursue compensation for your injuries and should call Timothy L. Miles today for a free case evaluation as you may be entitled to substantial compensation from airbag injury settlements. (855) 846-6529 or [email protected], 24/7 and no charge, of course.

---

Criminal Proceedings

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) played a significant role in addressing the Takata airbag crisis through criminal proceedings:

1. Investigation: The DOJ conducted an extensive investigation into Takata's handling of the airbag defect, focusing on potential fraud and misconduct.
2. Charges: In January 2017, the DOJ filed criminal charges against Takata Corporation, alleging wire fraud in connection with the company's sales of defective airbag inflators.
3. Guilty Plea: Takata pleaded guilty to criminal misconduct, admitting to providing false test data to automakers to conceal the airbag defect.
4. Financial Penalties: As part of the plea agreement, Takata agreed to pay $1 billion in criminal penalties, divided into three main components:
   • $850 million in restitution to automakers
   • $125 million for a victim compensation fund
   • $25 million criminal fine
5. Individual Prosecutions: Several Takata executives faced criminal charges for their roles in concealing information about the defective airbags.

Civil Litigation

​The civil litigation aspect of the Takata airbag recall was extensive and multifaceted:

1. Class Action Lawsuits: Numerous class action lawsuits were filed on behalf of vehicle owners and lessees affected by the recall. These suits typically sought compensation for diminished vehicle value, out-of-pocket expenses, and other economic losses.
2. Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Lawsuits: Individuals who suffered injuries or families who lost loved ones due to defective Takata airbags filed separate lawsuits seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other damages.
3. Multidistrict Litigation (MDL): Many of the individual and class action lawsuits were consolidated into multidistrict litigation to streamline the legal process. This consolidation allowed for more efficient handling of pretrial proceedings and discovery.
4. State Attorney General Actions: Several state attorneys general filed lawsuits against Takata and certain automakers, alleging violations of consumer protection laws.

Regulatory Actions

​Regulatory bodies, particularly the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), played a crucial role in addressing the Takata airbag recall:

1. Recall Mandates: NHTSA issued a series of recall orders, progressively expanding the scope of affected vehicles as more information became available.
2. Consent Orders: The agency issued consent orders to Takata and certain automakers, outlining requirements for recall implementation, reporting, and other remedial actions.
3. Civil Penalties: NHTSA imposed civil penalties on Takata for violations of the Motor Vehicle Safety Act.
4. Coordinated Remedy Program: NHTSA established a Coordinated Remedy Program to prioritize the replacement of the most dangerous airbags and ensure an adequate supply of replacement parts.

Bankruptcy Proceedings

Takata's financial situation deteriorated as a result of the crisis, leading to bankruptcy:

1. Chapter 11 Filing: In June 2017, Takata filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States and Japan.
2. Asset Sale: As part of the bankruptcy proceedings, Key Safety Systems, a Chinese-owned auto supplier, acquired most of Takata's assets.
3. Restructuring: The bankruptcy process involved restructuring to address liabilities while ensuring continued production of replacement airbags.

The Takata Airbag Settlement Framework

​The Takata airbag settlement emerged from these various legal proceedings, incorporating elements to address different aspects of the crisis:

1. Compensation Funds:
   • Individual Restitution Fund (IRF): Established to compensate individuals who suffered personal injuries or wrongful death due to defective Takata airbags.
   • Tort Compensation Trust Fund: Created to address future claims and provide ongoing compensation.
2. Automaker Settlements: Several automobile manufacturers reached separate settlements with affected consumers, often including provisions for rental cars, reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses, and residual distribution payments.
3. Recall Support: The settlement included provisions to ensure continued production and distribution of replacement airbags, as well as funding for outreach programs to increase recall completion rates.
4. Oversight and Monitoring: A special master was appointed to oversee the distribution of compensation funds, and ongoing reporting requirements were established to ensure compliance with settlement terms.
5. Future Claims Provisions: Mechanisms were established to address potential future injuries or deaths related to the defective airbags.
6. Consumer Protection Measures: The settlement included enhanced notification procedures to ensure affected vehicle owners were aware of the recall, as well as provisions for loaner vehicles and alternative transportation during recall repairs.

The legal landscape of the Takata airbag settlement reflects the complexity of addressing a large-scale automotive safety crisis. It demonstrates the interplay between criminal, civil, and regulatory actions in crafting a comprehensive solution. The resulting settlement not only aims to compensate those affected but also to implement systemic changes to prevent similar crises in the future.

Eligibility and Compensation Under the Settlement

Call us today if you were injured by a defective Takata airbag about the Takata Airbag Settlement

Understanding who is eligible for compensation under the Takata airbag settlement and what types of compensation are available is crucial for affected individuals. This section outlines the key aspects of eligibility and compensation under the settlement.

Eligibility Criteria
The eligibility criteria for compensation under the Takata airbag settlement are designed to encompass a wide range of affected individuals. Generally, eligibility falls into two main categories:

1. Personal Injury or Wrongful Death Claims:
   • Individuals who suffered personal injuries due to the deployment of a defective Takata airbag.
   • Family members of individuals who died as a result of injuries caused by a defective Takata airbag.
2. Economic Loss Claims:
   • Current and former owners or lessees of vehicles equipped with defective Takata airbags.
   • Individuals who incurred out-of-pocket expenses related to the Takata airbag recall.

Specific eligibility requirements may include:

• The injury or death occurred in a vehicle that was subject to the Takata airbag recall.
• The incident occurred within a specified timeframe, typically before the vehicle's airbags were replaced under the recall.
• For economic loss claims, the individual owned or leased an affected vehicle during a specified period.

Types of Compensation Available
The Takata airbag settlement provides various forms of compensation, depending on the nature of the claim:

1. Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Compensation:
   • Medical expenses
   • Lost wages
   • Pain and suffering
   • Funeral expenses (in wrongful death cases)
   • Loss of consortium or companionship
2. Economic Loss Compensation:
   • Reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses related to the recall
   • Compensation for diminished vehicle value
   • Rental car or alternative transportation costs during recall repairs
   • Residual distribution payments (in some cases)
3. Future Claims Provisions:
   • The settlement includes mechanisms to address potential future injuries or deaths related to Takata airbags.

​Compensation Funds
Two primary funds were established to manage compensation under the settlement:

1. Individual Restitution Fund (IRF):
   • Established as part of Takata's criminal plea agreement
   • Focused on compensating individuals who suffered personal injuries or wrongful death
2. Tort Compensation Trust Fund:
   • Created through Takata's bankruptcy proceedings
   • Addresses both current and future personal injury and wrongful death claims

Compensation Process
The process for seeking compensation under the Takata airbag settlement typically involves the following steps:

1. Claim Submission: Affected individuals must submit a claim form along with supporting documentation.
2. Claim Review: The claim is reviewed by the fund administrators or a designated claims facility.
3. Determination: A decision is made regarding eligibility and the amount of compensation.
4. Appeal Process: If a claimant disagrees with the determination, there is usually an appeal process available.

Factors Affecting Compensation
The amount of compensation an individual may receive can vary based on several factors:

• Severity of injuries
• Economic losses incurred
• Type of claim (personal injury, wrongful death, or economic loss)
• Available funds in the compensation pools
• Specific terms of automaker settlements (for economic loss claims)

Time Limitations
It's important to note that there are often time limitations for filing claims under the settlement:

• Personal injury and wrongful death claims typically have a specific window for submission, often tied to the date of injury or death.
• Economic loss claims may have deadlines based on the settlement terms with specific automakers.

Special Considerations

1. Multiple Claims: In some cases, individuals may be eligible to file both personal injury and economic loss claims.
2. State-Specific Variations: The terms of economic loss settlements may vary by state, particularly for claims against specific automakers.
3. Ongoing Recalls: The settlement includes provisions for continued recall efforts and replacement of defective airbags.

Understanding the eligibility criteria and compensation structure of the Takata airbag settlement is crucial for affected individuals seeking redress. While the settlement aims to provide comprehensive compensation, navigating the claims process can be complex. As such, many individuals choose to seek legal assistance to ensure they receive the full compensation to which they are entitled.

---

The Role of Legal Representation in Takata Airbag Cases

Hiring a Takata airbag lawyer is a necessity if you were injured by a defective Takata Airbag. Contact Timothy L. Miles today

Navigating the complexities of the Takata airbag settlement can be challenging for individuals seeking compensation. This is where legal representation plays a crucial role. Attorneys practicing in product liability and mass tort litigation can provide invaluable assistance to those affected by defective Takata airbags.

---

Importance of a Takata Airbag Lawyer

Understanding Complex Legal Frameworks

• The Takata airbag settlement involves intricate legal structures, including multidistrict litigation, bankruptcy proceedings, and various compensation funds.
• A Takata airbag lawyer is well-versed in these complexities and can navigate them effectively on behalf of their clients.

Knowledge of Product Liability Law:

• Takata airbag cases fall under the broader category of product liability law.
• A Takata airbag lawyer is experienced in this field understand the nuances of proving liability and damages in defective product cases.

Experience with Mass Tort Litigation

• The Takata airbag crisis resulted in one of the largest mass tort litigations in automotive history.
• A Takata airbag lawyer will have handled similar cases can leverage their experience to benefit their clients.

call a Takata airbag lawyer today about the Takata Airbag Settlement if you were injured by a defective Takata airbag

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​If you or a loved one were injured by a defective Takata airbag, contact Takata airbag lawyer Timothy L. Miles today for a free case evaluation and see if you are eligible for compensation from the Takata Airbag Settlement.  Call a Timothy L. Miles today you could be entitled to substantial compensation. 
​
Remember, the call is free and so is the fee unless we win or settle your case, so give Timothy L. Miles a call today. 855/846-6529 or [email protected].

The Law Offices of Timothy L. Miles
Tapestry at Brentwood Town Center
​300 Centerview Dr., #247
Brentwood, TN 37027
Phone: (855) 846–6529
​​Email: [email protected]

Takata airbag lawyer Timothy L. Miles ​

Timothy L. Miles is a top-rated and AV preeminent lawyer in Nashville, Tennessee and a nationally known class action and products liability lawyer who has been leading the fight to protect consumer rights for over 22 years. Mr. Miles received a Bachelor of Science in Psychology from Belmont University in Nashville, Tennessee in 1995 and his J.D. from the Nashville School of Law in May 2001, graduating third in his class, and was made a member of the Honorable Society of Cooper’s Inn which is reserved for students graduating in the top ten percent of their class.

He is admitted to practice before the Tennessee Supreme Court; the United States District Court for the Western, Middle and Eastern Districts of Tennessee and the District of Colorado; and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.  He is a member of the Nashville Bar Association; National Trial Lawyers Association; and Harry Phillips American Inns of Court (Student Member 2000). Mr. Miles has dedicated his career to representing consumers and shareholders in complex class-action litigation, products liability and mass torts.

Whether serving as lead, co-lead, or liaison counsel, Mr. Miles has helped recover millions of dollars for aggrieved consumers, shaped precedent-setting decisions, and delivered real corporate governance reforms. Judges and peers have repeatedly recognized Mr. Miles’ relentless advocacy for the underdog, as well as his unbendable ethical standards.
​
For example, Mr. Miles is a member of the prestigious Top 100 Civil Plaintiff Trial Lawyers: The National Trial Lawyers Association, which is by invitation only and is “extended to those attorneys who exemplify superior qualifications, trial results, and leadership in their respective state based upon objective and uniformly applied criteria.” The National Trial Lawyers Association explained the significance of this honor: “With the selection of Timothy L. Miles by The National Trial Lawyers: Top 100, [Mr.] Miles has shown that he exemplifies superior qualifications, leadership skills, and trial results as a trial lawyer. The selection process for this elite honor is based on a multi-phase process which includes peer nominations combined with third party research.” Further, “[m]embership is extended only to the select few of the most qualified attorneys from each state or region who demonstrate superior qualifications of leadership, reputation, influence, stature and public profile measured by objective and uniformly applied standards in compliance with state bar and national Rule 4-7.”
​
Additionally, Mr. Miles has maintained an AV Preeminent Rating in securities law with Martindale-Hubble since 2014, their highest award given. The coveted AV Preeminent rating is reserved for “[a]n elite group of approximately 10 percent of all attorneys.”  Additionally, while Martindale’s peer review ratings have been trusted for decades because they are based on the opinions and feedback of fellow legal practitioners, the organization’s special judicial edition rating, which Mr. Miles received this year for the sixth year in a row, is an even higher honor. As Martindale notes, the prestigious judicial rating is its highest possible distinction, and is representative of the opinions of both a lawyer’s peers and members of the judiciary.

CONTACT                                                      
The Law Offices of Timothy L. Miles
Tapestry at Brentwood Town Center
​300 Centerview Dr., #247
Brentwood, TN 37027
​​Phone:(855) 846-6529
​Email: [email protected]
​Websites:
www.classactionlawyertn.com