Riskified Ltd. Class Action Lawsuit

Company Name:               Riskified Ltd.

Stock Symbol:                   RSKD

Class Period:                     Purchasers of Riskified Ltd. (NYSE: RSKD) Class A ordinary shares in or traceable to Riskified’s July                                                2021 initial public offering

Motion Deadline:                July 1, 2022

Court:                                 Southern District of New York

​​​If you suffered losses in Riskified stock, contact Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer Timothy  L. Miles

Investor Who Suffered Losses in Riskified Stock Files Riskified Class Action Lawsuit

If you suffered losses in Riskified stock, call a Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer about a Riskified Ltd. Class Action Lawsuit

An investor who suffered losses in Riskified stock, filed a class action lawsuit seeking to represent purchasers of Riskified Ltd. (NYSE: RSKD) Class A ordinary shares in or traceable to Riskified’s July 2021 initial public offering (the “IPO”).  Commenced on May 2, 2022, the Riskified class action lawsuit – captioned Thomas v. Riskified Ltd., Case No. 1:22-cv-03545 and filed in the Southern District of New York – charges Riskified, certain of its top executives and directors, as well as the IPO’s underwriters with violations of the Securities Act of 1933. For additional qurstions, contact Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer Timothy L. Miles.

​​If you suffered losses in Riskified stock and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Riskified class action lawsuit, please provide your information below.  You can also contact Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer Timothy L. Miles by calling 855/846-6529 or via e-mail at tmiles@timmileslaw.com.  Lead plaintiff motions for the Riskified class action lawsuit must be filed with the court no later than Julyj, 2022. If you suffered losses in Riskified stock and have questions, please call Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer Timothy L. Miles today.

---

Allegations in the Riskified Class Action Lawsuit

Call a Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer to See if You Are Eligible for the Riskified Class Action Lawsuit

Riskified operates a risk management platform that utilizes machine learning to protect its merchant-clients from fraud.  On July 1, 2021, Riskified filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) a registration statement on Form F-1 for the IPO, which, after several amendments, was declared effective on July 28, 2021 (the “Registration Statement”).  The Registration Statement was used to sell to the investing public 20.125 million Riskified Class A ordinary shares at $21 per share, generating over $422 million in gross proceeds. 
​
The Riskified class action lawsuit alleges that the IPO’s Registration Statement made inaccurate statements of material fact because they failed to disclose the following adverse facts that existed at the time of the IPO: (i) as Riskified expanded its user base, the quality of Riskified’s machine learning platform had deteriorated (rather than improved as represented in the Registration Statement), because of, among other things, inaccuracies in the algorithms associated with onboarding new merchants and entering new geographies and industries; (ii) Riskified had expanded its customer base into industries with relatively high rates of fraud – including partnerships with cryptocurrency and remittance businesses – in which Riskified had limited experience and that this expansion has negatively impacted the effectiveness of Riskified’s machine learning platform; (iii) as a result, Riskified was suffering from materially higher chargebacks and cost of revenue and depressed gross profits and gross profit margins during its third fiscal quarter of 2021; and (iv) thus, the Registration Statement’s representations regarding Riskified’s historical financial and operational metrics and purported market opportunities did not accurately reflect the actual business, operations, and financial results and trajectory of Riskified prior to and at the time of the IPO, and were materially false and misleading, and lacked a factual basis.
On September 9, 2021, during a conference call to discuss Riskified’s financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2021, Riskified’s CFO, defendant Aglika Dotcheva, stated that Riskified tended “to experience higher chargebacks when we enter a new industry.”
​
Then, on November 16, 2021, Riskified announced its third quarter ended September 30, 2021 results, revealing that Riskified’s revenue growth had declined to 26% year-over-year, Riskified’s Gross Merchandise Value (“GMV”) growth had declined to 28% year-over-year, Riskified’s gross profits had increased only 10% year-over-year, Riskified’s gross profit margins had plummeted to just 46% during the quarter, and Riskified’s gross profit fell sequentially to $24.3 million.  Further, Riskified’s cost of revenue had jumped to $28.3 million in the third quarter of 2021, primarily as a result of a sharp increase in chargeback expenses.  During the earnings call, defendant Dotcheva blamed Riskified’s growing merchant base as a primary cause of increased chargebacks.

Finally, on February 23, 2022, Riskified announced its fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2021 results, disclosing that Riskified’s revenue growth and GMV growth had continued to decelerate, Riskified’s gross profit growth remained muted, and Riskified’s cost of revenue had continued to climb.  Riskified also revealed that it expected to generate only between $254 million and $257 million in 2022 revenues (which would represent only 11.5% year-over-year growth) and an adjusted 2022 earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization of between negative $69 million and $66 million (which would more than triple the losses suffered by Riskified in 2021), indicating that the adverse business trends being suffered by Riskified were in fact accelerating.  During the earnings call the same day, defendant Dotcheva stated that the year-over-year decline in gross profit margin experienced “was driven primarily by [Riskified’s] expansion into new industries and regions, increase of the tickets in travel industry as a percentage of total billings as well as the onboarding of new merchants."
0
At the time of the filing of the lawsuit, Riskified Class A shares traded below $6 per share, more than 70% below the IPO price.  As a result, investors ​suffered losses in Riskified stock.  For additional qestions about the Riskified class action lawsuit, and if you suffered losses in Riskified stock, contact Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer Timothy L. Miles if you suffered losses in Riskified stock about a Riskified class action lawsuit.

---

The Lead Plaintiff Process

Call a Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer today if You suffered losses in Riskified stock

​​The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchaserd Rikified's Class A ordinary shares in or traceable to Riskified’s July 2021 initial public offering, who suffered losses in Riskified stock, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Innovative Industrial Properties class action lawsuit.  A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class.  A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the securities class action lawsuit.  The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the class action lawsuit.  An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery of the class action lawsuit is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. If you suffered losses in Riskified stock, and have further questions, contact Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer Timothy L. Miles today who will fight to recover your damages.

---

How Can a Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer Help Me?

​A Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer is well-versed in the complex laws that govern the securities industry and litigation.  A Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer focuses on representing individual investors or funds who have been the victims of fraud or who have disputes with investment professionals.  Ordinary individual investors, including civil servants, teachers, nurses, and retirees, may need a securities lawyer. In most cases, if they have lost money due to mistakes, incompetence, or fraud by an investment professional.  While FINRA, the SEC, and state securities regulators serve a vital role in protecting investors, they simply have too many individuals, firms, and market transactions to monitor to discovery every act of fraud or negligence. Individual investors should consult with a securities lawyer if they have lost money due to fraud or stockbroker misconduct, such as a Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer who will work to recover the losses you sustained.​

Contact a Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer Today If You Suffered Losses in Riskified

​​​If you suffered losses in Riskified stock, contact Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer Timothy  L. Miles today about a Riskified class action lawsuit,and see what a ​Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer can do for you.

​ ​CONTACT US FOR A FREE RISKFIED CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT CASE EVALUATION
IF YOU SUFFERED LOSSES IN RISKIFIED STOCK

Contact Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer Timothy L. Miles today ​​If you suffered losses in Riskified stock

ATTENTION: RISKIFIED CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT
If you suffered losses in Riskified stock, call a Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer​
​for free about a Riskified class action lawsuit today. We are here to help.

Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer​
 (855) Tim-MLaw (855-846-6529)
​​tmiles@timmileslaw.com 
If you suffered losses in Riskified stock, contact a Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer today about a Riskified class action lawsuit today.

FREE CASE EVALUATION
Call today for a free, no obligation case evaluation with a Riskified Stock Fraud Lawyer if you suffered losses in Riskified stock about a Riskified class action lawsuit.