A Neurovascular Stent is a non-surgical method for treating brain aneurysms. However, the procedure may not be safe for everyone. We are investigating claims alleging that neurovascular stents used for stent assisted coiling (SAC) may put patients at an increased risk of stroke or death.
​​
If you or a loved one underwent stent assisted coiling and suffered a stroke or death during or after the procedure, contact Neurovascular Stent Lawyer Timothy L. Miles.  You may be eligible for a Neurovascular Stent Lawsuit and substantial compensation. 

Read on to learn more about a Neurovascular lawsuit. ​

Neurovascular stents are available from several manufacturers, including Stryker Neurovascular and Covidien Plc, and are used in treating saccular, intracranial, and wide-neck aneurysms.

An aneurysm is a weak spot in the blood vessel wall which causes the vessel to bulge outward like a bubble. Though an aneurysm can occur in any blood vessel, this condition is especially dangerous in the brain because if the weakened vessel bursts, it can cause uncontrollable, often fatal, brain bleeding.
​
In neurovascular SAC procedures, doctors weave a microcatheter through the patient's groin to the aneurysm. Once there, a coil is released and inserted inside the weak and bulging blood vessel to seal it off and prevent more blood from entering the aneurysm. The stent holds the coil in place. ​

​Though stent assisted coiling devices were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) through the Humanitarian Device Exception, that does not mean that they are safe for everyone.

In fact, on May 8, 2018, the FDA issued a safety alert to all health providers. This letter was published after the FDA received reports that doctors performed the procedure on high-risk patients who could not tolerate the treatment.

The letter warned, “These procedures are not without risks, and careful patient selection and proper device use are critical to ensure that the benefits to the patient outweigh the risk of treatment."

Neurovascular stent procedures require anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies, so patients who can’t undergo these blood-thinning regimens should not have the procedure.

Another risk of stent assisted coiling devices is that the device may not work and the brain aneurysm may still rupture. Sometimes the microcatheters may become entangled with the stent struts, causing the stent to change position, injure the blood vessel, or rupture the brain aneurysm.

Some patients are more susceptible to brain aneurysms. Health care providers shouldn’t recommend the procedure for patients with the following risk factors for ruptured aneurysms: 

• Older than 40 years of age
• Hypertension
• Family history of subarachnoid hemorrhages (SAH)
• Previous SAH
• Tobacco use
• Ethnicity: African Americans have the highest risk factor for SAH

​Patients should be properly informed of the serious risks for this procedure and the possibility of aneurysm rupture, which could lead to stroke or death.

The FDA also warns against unnecessarily performing this procedure on patients with small brain aneurysms or a lowered life expectancy. Smaller aneurysms, such as those less than five millimeters, are at a much lower rate of rupture than large (11-25 millimeters) or giant aneurysms (more than 25 millimeters). Smaller aneurysms can be treated more conservatively and may not even need a stent procedure.

“These procedures are not without risks, and careful patient selection and proper device use are critical to ensure that the benefits to the patient outweigh the risk of treatment,” the FDA said.

You may be eligible for a Neurovascular Stent Lawsuit if you or a loved one underwent a stent assisted coiling procedure and suffered a stroke or death during or after the procedure. Contact Neurovascular Stent Lawyer Timothy L. Miles to see if you are eligible for a Neurovascular Stent Lawsuit and possibly entitled substantial compensation.  

​​If you or a loved one underwent a stent assisted coiling procedure and suffered a stroke or death during or after the procedure and believe you are eligible for a Neurovascular Stent Lawsuit, fill out the this for a form for a free case evaluation with a Neurovascular Stent Lawyer to see if you are eligible for a Neurovascular Stent Lawsuit and possibly entitled to substantial compensation.

​​If you or a loved one underwent a stent assisted coiling procedure and suffered a stroke or death during or after the procedure and believe you are eligible for a Neurovascular Stent Lawsuit, fill out this form for a free case evaluation with a Neurovascular Stent Lawyer to see if you are eligible for a Neurovascular Stent Lawsuit and possibly entitled to substantial compensation.

​A Neurovascular Stent Lawsuit against the stent manufacturer may help recover compensation for the following:

• Medical bills
• Loss of wages (past and future)
• Pain and suffering

Contact Neurovascular Stent ​lawyer Timothy L. Miles today to see if you are eligible for a Neurovascular Stent ​lawsuit.

If you are eligible for a Neurovascular Stent Lawsuit, it does not cost anything to hire a Neurovascular Stent Lawyer.  We take all cases on a contingency basis which means we do not get paid unless we win your case. A Neurovascular Stent Lawyer can explain the process and answer any questions you may have including whether you are eligible for a Neurovascular Stent ​lawsuit and possibly be entitled to substantial compensation. Call Neurovascular Stent ​lawyer Timothy L. Miles today and see what he can do for you if you are eligible for a Neurovascular Stent Lawsuit. ​

If you or your loved one were injured or died during or directly after the neurovascular stent with SAC procedure, you may qualify to participate in a class action lawsuit against the medical device manufacturer.​​

​Contact Neurovascular Stent Lawyer Timothy L. Miles today to see if you are eligible for a Neurovascular Stent Lawsuit and see what a Neurovascular Stent Lawyer can do for you.

Previous research suggested that hair straightener products and other products for straightened hair are associated with an increased risk of certain hormone-related cancers, breast and ovarian cancers being the most notable.  Now, a new study by in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute (JNCI) has linked the use of hair straightener products to an increased risk in uterine cancer, and Black females may be affected at a higher rate due to their higher usage of hair straightener products the study noted. 

The study found that out of women who had not used hair straightener products in the last 12 months, only 1.6% developed uterine cancer by the age of 70.  However, approximately 4% of women who frequently use hair straightener products developed uterine cancer by the age of 70.  The fact that uterine cancer is so rare, the doubling of its risk raises concern.  Chandra Jackon, an author of the study and researcher at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) stated, "In this study, women with frequent use in the past year had an over two-fold higher risk of uterine cancer.” Using hair straightener products more than four times a year was defined as frequent. 

If you used products for straightened hair and subsequently were diagnosed with uterine cancer, breast cancer or suffered any other any other significant adverse health effects from hair straightener products, contact Hair Straightener Lawyer Timothy L. Miles to see if you may be eligible for a hair straightener lawsuit and possibly be entitled to significant compensation as a result of using products for straightened hair.

​​​Hair Straightener products include but are not limited to hair products by brands like Soft & Beautiful, Dark & Lovely, Optimum Care, Just for Me, Creme of Nature, Motions, Carson Soft Sheen, and Olive Oil. At-home products and salon-use products both qualify.  While these are the most common, they are not the only products f0r straightened hair.
​
Chemical hair straightening is the most permanent hair smoothing method available.  It is also the method that inflicts the most damage to your hair.  A chemical creme is applied to the hair to relax the curls while breaking down the protein bonds in the hair making the hair straighter.  Other products for straightened hair work the same way. 

Previous studies have shown that some widely used chemicals in hair straightener products disrupt the endocrine system, which is responsible for messaging chemicals in our bodies that connect hormones to their target organs. In the past, Uterine cancer has been linked to an excess of hormones such as estrogen and progesterone, and numerous hair products can mimic these natural hormones and bind to the receptor.  

Four years ago, researchers found endocrine disrupting chemicals in 18 hair straightener products they tested. More troublesome was the finding that 84% of the chemicals identified were not listed on product labels and 11 of the products were prohibited under the European Union's Cosmetics Directive or regulated by California law.  Today, U.S. regulations mandate testing for estrogen receptor activity only when it comes to pesticides and drinking water contaminants.  Hair straightener products, on the other hand, are not regulated.

A 2019 study by National Institutes of Health (NIH) found that permanent hair dye and chemicals in hair straightener products are associated with a higher risk of breast cancer, particularly among black females who use these treatments more regularly. A follow-up study in 2021 found that permanent hair dye and hair straightener products are also associated with a higher risk of ovarian cancer. ​

​The study data also showed that the link between hair straightener products and uterine cancer cases was most pronounced for Black females.  While they made up only 7.4% of the study participants, 59.9% of those who reported ever using straighteners. Thus, the exposure among black females appears higher. Based on prior studies and literature, it is well known that hair straightener products marketed directly to Black children and women have been shown to contain multiple chemicals known to disrupt hormones and these same products marketed to Black females also contain a harsher chemical formulation. 

Chandra Jackson, an author of the study, also stated ​"we know that Black women tend to use multiple products simultaneously, which could contribute to Black women on average having higher concentrations of these hormone-disrupting chemicals in their system."

​If you notice any of these uterine cancer symptoms, you should contact your doctor immediately:

• Cramping or pain in the lower abdomen or pelvic area below your belly
• Vaginal bleeding or spotting between periods before menopause
• Vaginal bleeding or spotting postmenopause to any degree
• Very frequent, heavy, or prolonged vaginal bleeding over the age of 40
• White or clear vaginal discharge in postmenopausal women

​If you used hair straightener products and subsequently were diagnosed with uterine cancer, breast cancer or ovarian cancer or suffered any other any other serious adverse health effects from hair straightener products, then you may be eligible for a hair straightener lawsuit and possibly be entitled to substantial compensation.  

Contact Hair Straightener Lawyer Timothy L. Miles today and see if you are eligible for a hair straightener lawsuit if you used hair straightener products.

​It does not cost anything to hire a hair straightener lawyer. We take all cases on a contingency basis which means we do not get paid unless we win your case, so contact us today. A hair straightener lawyer can explain the process and answer any questions you may have. So, the call is free and so is the fee unless we win your case. If you were diagnosed with uterine cancer from using hair straightener products, contact us today for a free case evaluation, you may be eligible for a hair straightener lawsuit and possibly substantial compensation.

If you are eligible for a hair straightener lawsuit, a successful plaintiff is entitled to compensatory damages which would include compensation for things such as:

• past and future medical expenses;  
• pain and suffering including emotional distress; and 
• lost wages and the reduction in your ability to earn an income.

If your Hair Straightener lawsuit proceeds to trial it is also possible the court could impose punitive damages, intended to punish the defendant for their actions. ​

If you used hair straightener products or other products for straightened hair and subsequently were diagnosed with uterine cancer or breast cancer or suffered any other any other adverse health side effects from hair straightener products, contact hair straightener lawyer Timothy L. Miles to see if you may be eligible for a hair straightener lawsuit and possibly be entitled to significant compensation. While there is still time to file a lawsuit, be mindful that these cases are time sensitive, and give us a call today. ​

A Neurovascular Stent is a non-surgical method for treating brain aneurysms. However, the procedure may not be safe for everyone. We are investigating claims alleging that neurovascular stents used for stent assisted coiling (SAC) may put patients at an increased risk of stroke or death.
​​

​If you or a loved one underwent stent assisted coiling and suffered a stroke or death during or after the procedure, contact Neurovascular Stent Lawyer Timothy L. Miles.  You may be eligible for a Neurovascular Stent Lawsuit and possibly entitled to substantial compensation. (855) Tim-M-Law (855-846-6529) or [email protected]

Read on for answers to four frequently asked questions about a Neurovascular Stent Lawsuit.

​Though stent assisted coiling devices were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) through the Humanitarian Device Exemption, that does not mean that they are safe for everyone.

In fact, on May 8, 2018, the FDA issued a safety alert to all health providers. This letter was published after the FDA received reports that doctors performed the procedure on high-risk patients who could not tolerate the treatment.

The letter warned, “These procedures are not without risks, and careful patient selection and proper device use are critical to ensure that the benefits to the patient outweigh the risk of treatment."

Neurovascular stent procedures require anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies, so patients who can’t undergo these blood-thinning regimens should not have the procedure.

Another risk of stent assisted coiling devices is that the device may not work and the brain aneurysm may still rupture. Sometimes the microcatheters may become entangled with the stent struts, causing the stent to change position, injure the blood vessel, or rupture the brain aneurysm.

Some patients are more susceptible to brain aneurysms. Health care providers shouldn’t recommend the stent assisted coiling procedure for patients with the following risk factors for ruptured aneurysms: 

• Older than 40 years of age
• Hypertension
• Family history of subarachnoid hemorrhages (SAH)
• Previous SAH
• Tobacco use
• Ethnicity: African Americans have the highest risk factor for SAH

Patients should be properly informed of the serious risks of stent assisted coiling and the possibility of aneurysm rupture, which could lead to stroke or death.

The FDA also warns against unnecessarily performing this procedure on patients with small brain aneurysms or a lowered life expectancy. Smaller aneurysms, such as those less than five millimeters, are at a much lower rate of rupture than large (11-25 millimeters) or giant aneurysms (more than 25 millimeters). Smaller aneurysms can be treated more conservatively and may not even need a stent procedure.

“These procedures are not without risks, and careful patient selection and proper device use are critical to ensure that the benefits to the patient outweigh the risk of treatment,” the FDA said.

You may be eligible for a Neurovascular Stent Lawsuit if you or a loved one underwent a stent assisted coiling procedure and suffered a stroke or death during or after the procedure. Contact Neurovascular Stent Lawyer Timothy L. Miles to see if you are eligible for a Neurovascular Stent Lawsuit and possibly entitled substantial compensation.  

​​If you or a loved one underwent a stent assisted coiling procedure and suffered a stroke or death during or after the procedure and believe you are eligible for a Neurovascular Stent Lawsuit, contact Timothy L Miles today for a free case evaluation with a Neurovascular Stent Lawyer to see if you are eligible for a Neurovascular Stent Lawsuit and possibly entitled to substantial compensation.

Previous research suggested that chemical hair straightening products are associated with an increased risk of certain hormone-related cancers, breast and ovarian cancers being the most notable.  Now, a new study by in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute (JNCI) has linked the use of chemical hair straighteners to an increased risk in uterine cancer, and Black females may be affected at a higher rate due to their higher usage the study noted. 

The study found that out of women who had not used chemical hair straightening products in the last 12 months, only 1.6% developed uterine cancer by the age of 70.  However, approximately 4% of women who frequently use chemical hair straightening products developed uterine cancer by the age of 70.  The fact that uterine cancer is so rare, the doubling of its risk raises concern.  Chandra Jackon, an author of the study and researcher at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) stated, "In this study, women with frequent use in the past year had an over two-fold higher risk of uterine cancer.” Using chemical hair straighteners more than four times a year was defined as frequent. 

If you used chemical hair straightening products and subsequently were diagnosed with uterine cancer or suffered any other any other adverse health effects from chemical hair straightening products, contact lawyer Timothy L. Miles to see if you may be eligible for a chemical hair straightener lawsuit and possibly be entitled to significant compensation.

Read on for answers to five frequently asked questions about a chemical hair straightener lawsuit.

Previous studies have shown that some widely used chemicals in hair straightening products disrupt the endocrine system, which is responsible for messaging chemicals in our bodies that connect hormones to their target organs. In the past, Uterine cancer has been linked to an excess of hormones such as estrogen and progesterone, and numerous hair products can mimic these natural hormones and bind to the receptor.  

Four years ago, researchers found endocrine disrupting chemicals in 18 chemical hair products they tested. More troublesome was the finding that 84% of the chemicals identified were not listed on product labels and 11 of the products were prohibited under the European Union's Cosmetics Directive or regulated by California law.  Today, U.S. regulations mandate testing for estrogen receptor activity only when it comes to pesticides and drinking water contaminants.  Chemical hair products, on the other hand, are not regulated.

A 2019 study by National Institutes of Health (NIH) found that permanent hair dye and straightening chemicals are associated with a higher risk of breast cancer, particularly among black females who use these treatments more regularly. A follow-up study in 2021 found that permanent hair dye and straightening chemicals are also associated with a higher risk of ovarian cancer. ​

​The study data also showed that the link between chemical hair straightening products and uterine cancer cases was most pronounced for Black females.  While they made up only 7.4% of the study participants, 59.9% of those who reported ever using straighteners. Thus, the exposure among black females appears higher. Based on prior studies and literature, it is well known that hair products marketed directly to Black children and women have been shown to contain multiple chemicals known to disrupt hormones and these same products marketed to Black females also contain a harsher chemical formulation. 

Chandra Jackson, an author of the study, also stated ​ we know that Black women tend to use multiple products simultaneously, which could contribute to Black women on average having higher concentrations of these hormone-disrupting chemicals in their system.”

​If you used chemical hair straightener and subsequently were diagnosed with uterine cancer or suffered any other any other serious adverse health effects from chemical hair straightener, then you may be eligible for a chemical hair straightener lawsuit and possibly be entitled to substantial compensation.  

Call Chemical Hair Straightener Lawyer Timothy L. Miles today and see if you are eligible for a chemical hair straightener lawsuit.

​If you are eligible for a chemical hair straightener lawsuit, successful plaintiff is entitled to compensatory damages which would include compensation for things such as:

• past and future medical expenses;  
• pain and suffering including emotional distress; and 
• lost wages and the reduction in your ability to earn an income.

If your case proceeds to trial it is also possible the court could impose punitive damages, intended to punish the defendant for their actions.

​​​First, a ​Chemical Hair Straightener Lawyer can determine if you meet the are eligible for a chemical hair straightener lawsuit. More importantly, because of the complexity of the cases and the need to hire experts, a products liability attorney is the go-to attorney when you have been injured by a product that is defective. A Chemical Hair Straightener Lawyer, who is an experienced products liability attorney, can help you by putting you in the best possible position to win your chemical hair straightener cancer lawsuit and recover the most compensation.

​If you used chemical hair straightening products and subsequently were diagnosed with uterine cancer, contact lawyer Timothy L. Miles to see if you may be eligible for a chemical hair straightener lawsuit and possibly be entitled to significant compensation.

If your child consumed recalled baby formula and required medical attention, call a Baby Formula Lawyer Today

​On February 27, 2012 Abbott Laboratories, Inc. “(Abbott”) announced it was recalling powder formulas, including Similac, Alimentum and EleCare manufactured in Sturgis, Michigan, one of the company’s manufacturing facilities. The recall does not include any metabolic deficiency nutrition formulas. Products made at this facility can be found across the U.S. and were likely exported to other countries as well. Canadian health officials have also issued a recall warning.
​
Abbott is recalling these products after four consumer complaints related to Cronobacter sakazakii or Salmonella Newport in infants who had consumed powder infant formula manufactured in this facility.  The Company said its investigation is ongoing. ​If your baby was hospitalized after using Recalled Baby Formula or you have questions, contact Baby Formula Lawyer Timothy L. Miles about a Baby Formula Lawsuit today.

​The same day, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) announced it is investigating consumer complaints of Cronobacter sakazakii and Salmonella Newport infections. The FDA stated that in all of the cases are reported, each consumed powdered infant formula produced from Abbott Nutrition’s Sturgis, Michigan facility.
​
The FDA further stated it was alerting consumers to avoid purchasing or using certain powdered infant formula products. The FDA further stated it was alerting consumers to avoid purchasing or using certain powdered infant formula products produced at this facility. ​

The FDA is advising consumers not to use Similac, Alimentum, or EleCare powdered infant formulas if:

• the first two digits of the code are 22 through 37; and 
• the code on the container contains K8, SH or Z2; and 
• the expiration date is 4-1-2022 (APR 2022) or later.

​The FDA stated it was investigating complaints of four infant illnesses from three states. All four cases related to these complaints were hospitalized and Cronobacter may have contributed to a death in one case. The FDA stated it has initiated an onsite inspection at the facility and its findings to date include several positive Cronobacter sakazakii results from environmental samples taken and adverse inspectional observations by the FDA investigators. A review of the firm’s internal records also indicate environmental contamination with Cronobacter sakazakii and the firm’s destruction of product due to the presence of Cronobacter. 
​
“As this is a product used as the sole source of nutrition for many of our nation’s newborns and infants, the FDA is deeply concerned about these reports of bacterial infections,” said Frank Yiannas, FDA Deputy Commissioner for Food Policy and Response. “We want to reassure the public that we’re working diligently with our partners to investigate complaints related to these products, which we recognize include infant formula produced at this facility, while we work to resolve this safety concern as quickly as possible.”

​​In addition to the above, on February 28, 2012 Abbott additionally stated it was recalling one lot of Similac PM 60/40 (Lot # 27032K80 (can) / Lot # 27032K800 (case)) manufactured in Sturgis, Michigan.

To find out if your baby formula is subject to the recall, look on the bottom of the container for a product code that includes eight numbers or letters.

Then go to this website – www.similac.com/recall – where you can type in the code to see if your baby formula is on the list. If so, and your baby was hospitalized contact us about a Baby Formula Recall Lawsuit and see if you meet the Baby Formula Lawsuit Criteria.

​​The defective baby formula products contain bacteria that, if ingested, can cause a serious, life-threatening infection in young children. Any family that has Abbott products in their home should dispose of them and find a safer alternative for their children, one that does not jeopardize their health and wellbeing. Although there are only four cases of infections, it’s best to avoid the products entirely to ensure your child's safety.  If your baby consumed recalled baby formula call Timothy L. Miles today about a baby formula lawsuit.

Cronobacter sakazakii  is a bacteria commonly found in dry environments, like baby formula, and can cause stomach issues as well as urinary tract infections in people of all ages. However, when it’s ingested by a child two months or younger, it can result in more serious infections, like sepsis and meningitis. If your child exhibits any of the following symptoms after consuming a dry food product, you should seek medical treatment to ensure their safety:

• Fever
• Unusual patterns of crying
• Abnormally low energy
• Difficulty or refusal to eat

On the other hand, Salmonella Newport causes symptoms of foodborne illness, such as diarrhea, intestinal pressure, and vomiting. This type of bacteria is significantly more dangerous to children under three months of age, and an infant who’s infected with Salmonella Newport will exhibit the same symptoms as Cronobacter sakazakii. ​

​​If you notice that your child is exhibiting any of the symptoms mentioned above after consuming recalled baby formula, it is best to bring them to medical professional for a second opinion. The signs of a Cronobacter sakazakii or Salmonella Newport infection are very vague, and the behavior your child is showing could just be a coincidence rather than a severe diagnosis. However, you do not want to leave that up to chance, and by seeking medical attention sooner rather than later, you can protect your child from the consequences of an infection that has gone too far.

​There are basically two requirements in order to meet the Baby Formula Lawsuit criteria. If your child consumed Recalled Baby Formula and required hospitalization as a result, then you probably meet the Baby Formula Lawsuit Criteria.  To find out more, or to see if you meet the Baby formula lawsuit criteria, contact Baby Formula Lawyer Timothy L. Miles today for a free Baby Formula Lawsuit case evaluation. ​

Every case is unique, but people who successfully file drug or medical device lawsuits can recover money for some of the following damages if they meet the Baby Formula lawsuit criteria:
 
     • Past and future medical bills (including medication, hospital stays, and in-home care)
     • Pain and suffering
     • Lost wages
     • Loss of earning capacity
     • Funeral expenses (in the event of a loved one’s death)

In addition, it is possible the court could award punitive damages which are meant to punish the defendant.  You may also have a wrongful death claim if you child lost their life. Call Baby Formula Lawer Timothy L. Miles for a free case evaluation today of you think you meet the Baby formula lawsuit criteria. ​

​​Because of the complexity of the cases and the need to hire experts, a products liability attorney is the go-to attorney when you have been injured by a product that is defective like the defective baby formula products. A Baby Formula Lawyer, who is an experienced products liability attorney, can help you by putting you in the best possible position to win your Baby Formula Recall Lawsuit and recover the most compensation.

​All lawsuits involving Abbott's defective baby formula products, including consumer class actions and personal injury cases, have been transferred to the Northern District of Ilinois and assigned to Judge Matthew F. Kennelly for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings.  Additionally, a new class action has been filed and transferred to Judge Kennelly by the MDL.  The class action Baby Formula Lawsuit is a consumer class action that seeks compensation for economic loss causes by the defective baby formula products.