What You Need to Know About the Waupaca Elevator Class Action Lawsuit

7/31/2022

Falling unexpectedly to the bottom of an elevator after a free-fall sounds like something out of a horror movie. Unfortunately, for some owners of Waupaca defective elevators, it is a terrifying reality. In 2018, the company issued a recall on popular residential elevators due to faulty gearbox components that caused the systems to fail. Nevertheless, two years later, the Waupaca defective elevators still result in harm to the consumers that use them.

In realty, not only are these Waupaca defective elevators dangerous but the maintenance required to keep them safe is a significant recurring expense. If you own a Defective Waupaca in-home elevator, we can help you pursue the compensation you deserve through a Waupaca elevator lawsuit. Owners of Waupaca defective elevators can contact Timothy L. Miles, Esq., a Waupaca Elevator Lawyer, for a free, no-risk case evaluation today to learn about joining our Waupaca Elevator Class Action.

Rather than repair the Waupaca defective elevators' components directly, allegedly Waupaca decided to find another solution. The company allegedly pushed their authorized dealers to increase the routine maintenance of their products in an effort to keep the Waupaca defective elevators from failing. However, this plan was ultimately unsuccessful as the maintenance procedure allegedly did not contain any explicit evaluation of the defective gearbox in the Waupaca defective elevators.

Their next solution for the Waupaca defective elevators was to push for the installation of an aftermarket brake device that would prevent the elevator cab from crashing if the system failed. However, this product was also faulty and allegedly did little to prevent harm. When Waupaca became aware of the danger, they issued a warning to their customers allegedly containing factually inaccurate information regarding the symptoms of a potential crash including falling unexpectedly to the bottom in these Waupaca defective elevators.

Waupaca was given a chance to recall the defective components that caused their Waupaca defective elevators to become dangerous, yet “inventory restraints” prevented them from providing the correct components to their customers. While this may have caused an issue initially, it shouldn’t have taken two years to address a problem that’s putting consumers at risk and forcing them to have to file a Waupaca Elevator Lawsuit or join the Waupaca Elevator Class Action to seek redress. Call us today, a Waupaca Elevator Lawyer is waiting to speak to you for a free case evaluation about a Waupaca Elevator Lawsuit.

If you own one the Waupaca Defective Elevators do not continue to use the product. While only certain elevator models contain faulty components, you should contact an experienced technician to determine if your elevator is at risk for failure and falling unexpectedly to the bottom.

You should also gather any receipts you have detailing maintenance that was performed on your elevator. The allegedly unnecessary maintenance required by the manufacturer for the Waupaca Defective Elevators was expensive to you, the owner, and you shouldn’t have to bear the expense for their mistake. A Waupaca Elevator Lawyer will be able to assist you in recovering the financial damages resulting from your defective product and file a Waupaca Elevator Lawsuit

If you were physically injured by or burdened with the maintenance and upkeep of your Waupaca in-home elevator subject to the Waupaca Elevator Recall, contact a Waupaca Elevator Lawyer Timothy L. Miles today about a Waupaca Elevator Lawsuit.

Timothy L. Miles, Esq.

T imothy L. Miles is a nationally recognized shareholder rights attorney raised in Nashville, Tennessee. Mr. Miles was recentely selected by Martindale-Hubbell® and ALM as a 2022 Top Ranked Lawyer, 2022 Top Rated Litigator. and a 2022 Elite Lawyer of the South. Mr. Miles also maintains the AV Preeminent Rating by Martindale-Hubbell®, their highest rating for both legal ability and ethics. Mr. Miles is a member of the prestigious Top 100 Civil Plaintiff Trial Lawyers: The National Trial Lawyers Association, a superb rated attorney by Avvo, a recipient of the Lifetime Achievement Award by Premier Lawyers of America (2019) and recognized as a Distinguished Lawyer, Recognizing Excellence in Securities Law, by Lawyers of Distinction (2019). Mr. Miles hs publeshed over sixty articles on various issues of the law, including class actions, whistleblower cases, products liability, and more.

3 Frequently Asked Questions About the One-Wheel Skateboard Lawsuit

7/30/2022

The popular self-balancing skateboard, One-Wheel, revolutionized the industry when it first became available in 2015, but the single-wheel board has since caused many riders to endure painful injuries due to a product defect. As a result, many riders have been injured while using a One-Wheel Skateboard. According to many riders, the one-wheel board is prone to sudden stops, which deactivates the balancing technology within the board and causes it to take a nosedive, launching the rider forward. In some cases, the defect has caused the board to stop while the rider is traveling at high speeds, which has resulted in some very tragic wrongful deaths.

No one should have to lose their life from a defective product, especially when there are laws to prevent this from happening. The manufacturer of One-Wheel, Future Motion, has a responsibility to ensure the safety of their product prior to sale, but their negligence has caused injuries in some and multiple families to endure losing someone close to them. If you were injured while using a One-Wheel skateboard, contact Skateboard Lawyer, Timothy L. Miles today. Read on for the answers to three frequently asked questions.

Has Anyone Died on a One-Wheel?

Unfortunately, there have been three families have filed wrongful death lawsuits on behalf of loved ones who lost their lives while using a One-Wheel skateboard. These deaths occurred while the rider was traveling at high speeds, and the sudden stop of the board launched them forward and into the air. Each of the three deaths were caused by a defect within the product, meaning that they should not have happened at all. If the manufacturer had employed the proper safety precautions prior to the sale of their product, these families would still have their loved ones alive and well.

Can you Be Injured While Using a One-Wheel skateboard if it Powers Off?

Wen a one-wheel skateboard powers off during use, the front-facing side of the board falls forward and creates a wedge between the product and the ground. The rider is then propelled from the board into the air, which can be deadly if they land on their head or neck. According to some injured riders, the problem results from the One-Wheel’s “pushback” feature, which is designed to notify riders when they’re approaching the limitations of the device. Unlike traditional skateboarding, there’s not much the rider can do once the product powers down, and even highly experienced one-wheel riders have sustained traumatic injuries because of the defect. If you were injured while using a One-Wheel skateboard that powered off during use, call a Skateboard Lawyer today.

Is the One-Wheel Safe to Use?

Although Future Motion claims that their product has safety features, the end result of their product is not as safe as they intended. The pushback feature that is designed to keep the rider upright during use can be influenced by tire pressure, wind direction, battery level, surface condition, velocity, and the rider’s stance/weight, which should be alarming to anyone who owns the product. With so many factors contributing to the performance of the product, there is no way that any rider can use the product safely. If you own a One-Wheel skateboard, it is best to discontinue use until the manufacturer gives more information on how to stay safe.

Contact a Skateboard Lawyer Today

If you were injured while using a One-Wheel Skateboard, contact Skateboard Lawyer Timothy L. Miles about a One-Wheel Skateboard Lawsuit today.

Timothy L. Miles, Esq.

3 Frequently Asked Question in the Paraquat Exposure Lawsuits

7/28/2022

Paraquat, a restricted use pesticide, was first manufactured in 1961 and rapidly became one of the most common herbicides in the world. It is also one of the most dangerous, especially those who have suffered long term exposure to Paraquat. Scientists have long known that paraquat, often referred to as Gramoxone, is acutely toxic. Dubbed “highly poisonous” by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), it is so toxic, in fact, that a single sip of the herbicide can kill an adult. Paraquat’s toxicity causes massive damage to the mouth, stomach, and intestines. Once this deadly substance enters your body, it creates fatal interactions in the lungs, kidneys, and liver.

But in recent years, evidence has accumulated showing that repeated frequent exposure to paraquat, including secondary exposure, in low doses may be linked to the development of Parkinson’s disease. Read on for answers to three frequently asked questions.

Is There a Link Between Parkinson’s Disease and Frequent Exposure to Paraquat or Long Term Exposue to Paraquat?

Scientific research has concluded that those who use paraquat are twice as likely to develop Parkinson’s disease in the future. Not only that, but those who live in an area where paraquat is used are also at risk, as the wind can carry the airborne chemical into neighborhoods and other populated areas can result in significant exposure to paraquat. Despite numerous scientific studies into paraquat’s safety, the company responsible for the pesticide refused to acknowledge the potential risks of frequent exposure to paraquat and exposed thousands of innocent individuals to a hazardous chemical for over a decade, even though it is a restrictive use pesticide.

What is the Scientific Link that Long Term Exposure to Paraquat Can Lead to Parkinson's?

Numerous scientific studies have linked frequent exposure to paraquat to Parkinson’s. A large 2011 study of U.S. farmers found that those who used paraquat were twice as likely to develop Parkinson’s disease as those who didn’t use the restricted use pesticide. Other research has found that cumulative exposure over long periods increases the risk of developing Parkinson’s Data published by Louisiana State University shows that a person’s zip code and proximity to cropland where paraquat is applied correlates with the risk of developing Parkinson’s.

Scientists believe that a deficit of the neurotransmitter dopamine causes Parkinson’s. Studies have demonstrated that paraquat can kill dopamine-producing nerve cells in the brain. Inhaling paraquat, which could happen if workers come into contact with aerosolized droplets during crop spraying, gives it a direct pathway to the brain, say researchers at the University of Rochester. However, paraquat could also end up in the brain after ingestion or skin exposure. The CDC notes that, once paraquat enters the body, it is distributed to all areas of the body. Fred Kamel, a scientist within an epidemiology branch of the NIH, has said that research on the link between paraquat and Parkinson’s disease is “about as persuasive as these things can get.”

Do I Qualify for a Paraquat Exposure Lawsuit?

Many individuals are filing claims against the makers of paraquat, alleging the restricted use pesticide has either caused the individuals to develop Parkinson’s Disease or that the individuals are at an increased risk of developing Parkinson’s Disease because of prior long term and frequent exposure to paraquat. Lawsuits are being filed across the country, both in federal and state courts. Some cases are class actions, where one plaintiff serves as a class representative on behalf of similarly situated plaintiffs.

Other lawsuits are filed by individual plaintiffs who are not part of a class action but are part of consolidated mass tort litigation that includes numerous individually filed lawsuits rather than one large lawsuit filed on behalf of many.

Common plaintiffs in paraquat exposure lawsuit are licensed applicators/users, agricultural workers who were frequently exposed to Paraquat on farms, and individuals who did not work on farms but lived on or near farms where they were subject to secondary paraquat exposure. For more information, contact Timothy L. Miles, a Paraquat Exposure Lawyer today for a free case evaluation to see if your eligible for a Paraquat Exposure Lawsuit.

Call a Paraquat Exposure Lawyer Today

Call Timothy L. Miles, a Paraquat Exposure Lawyer today if you suffered long term exposure to paraquat and developed Parkinson's disease. (855) Tim-M-Law (855-846-6529).

Timothy L. Miles

What You Need to Know About the Bobby Pillow Recall Lawsuit

7/27/2022

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued the Bobby Pillow Recall for over 3 million baby lounger products after the manufacturer, The Boppy Company, received reports of infants suffocating while using their products. According to parents, the infants were placed in the product in a safe position, but the child fell asleep and rolled into a position that restricted their breathing. Baby loungers are infamous for their danger to sleeping children, and the Boppy Company’s products are no different, as the soft and plush nature provides the opposite of a safe sleeping environment.

This is not the first instance of a child losing their life to a Boppy Company Product; the first death was reported in 2015. Since that time, the company has made little to no change in the design of its product, which has resulted in more devastated parents having to deal with the loss of their children. Although the company claims that its product was never marketed as a sleeping device for infants, it is very apparent that something needs to change to keep children across the country safe from harm.

Which Products Are Being Recalled?

The Boppy Company has three different baby lounger products:

Boppy Original Newborn Lounger
Boppy Preferred Newborn Lounger
Pottery Barn Kids Newborn Lounger.

All three of these products are being recalled from store shelves, as they pose a significant risk to any child that falls asleep during use. The Boppy Company knew of the danger after the first death occurred in 2015, but after 6 years, they made no change and caused 7 additional deaths.

According to the CPSC recall, the pillows on the affected products could be overstuffed and force an infant’s head into a position where breathing is difficult. The combination of the overstuffed cushion and the unsafe sleep environment of the product creates a very dangerous situation for any infant who falls asleep in the lounger. The Boppy Company claims that there are specific instructions to supervise a child who is using the product, but considering infants fall asleep sporadically and sometimes quickly, the product could have been designed in a safer way that doesn’t pose such a risk.

Why Are Baby Loungers Dangerous?

Product liability laws exist to protect consumers from the unfortunate consequences of a defective product. Any manufacturer that fails to adhere to the proper safety guidelines before selling their product is liable for the damage, and by teaming up with an experienced Bobby Pillow Lawyer who can advocate on your behalf. Although the compensation from a lawsuit cannot change the past, it can help you recover from your situation and avoid financial strain.

Call a Bobby Pillow Lawyer Today

No product should ever endanger the life of its user, especially when that product is designed for infant children. The Boppy Company had more than enough time to make their product safer, and their failure to do so is an unacceptable offense. If a Boppy Company baby lounger has harmed your child, a Bobby Pillow Lawyer will fight on your behalf to hold the manufacturers accountable. Contact Bobby Pillow Lawyer Timothy L. Miles today.

Timothy L. Miles, Esq.

Two Frequently Asked Questions About the Xeljanz Lawsuits

7/26/2022

Xeljanz belongs to a class of drugs known as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. As Pfizer explains, our body has signaling proteins called cytokines that regulate immune system responses. The production of cytokines is increased when our body fights infection. Cytokine production is thought to play a role in chronic inflammatory conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ulcerative colitis. Xeljanz disrupts signaling that produces some of the cytokines, reducing inflammation. Specifically, Xeljanz blocks—or inhibits—the release of cytokines in the JAK signal pathway. Xeljanz has been approved for several different uses, including: rheumatoid arthritis; psoriatic arthritis; ulcerative colitis; and polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

When the FDA first approved Xeljanz in 2012, it ordered a post-marketing Xeljanz safety study known as ORAL Surveillance. But rather than confirming the safety of Xeljanz, the post-marketing Xeljanz Study revealed serious safety concerns and has led to new health alerts and warnings. In February 2019, the FDA warned that the ongoing Xeljanz safety trial found an increased risk of taking Xeljanz and developing blood clots in the lungs and death. In July 2019, the FDA announced that it had approved new warnings about thrombosis and death in patients treated with a 10 mg twice-daily dose of Xeljanz. The next major safety news to come out of the Xeljanz post-marketing study was equally concerning. The FDA alerted the public in February 2021 that preliminary results showed an increased risk of Xeljanz and cancer. With that background, here are answers to two frequently asked questions in the Xeljanz Lawsuits.

How Dangerous Is Xeljanz?

Xeljanz, while marketed as a safe medication, increases the risk of blood clots, cancer, and cardiovascular problems for its users. The FDA approved the drug upon release, but a post-marketing safety study revealed serious safety concerns and concluded that the side effects are more detrimental than initially believed. The company responsible for the medication, Pfizer, knew about the side effects prior to the safety study but failed to disclose this information to the public in an attempt to retain their profits. This unethical behavior exposed thousands of consumers to an elevated risk of harm, making their actions unacceptable

How Long Can You Stay on Xeljanz?

Anyone who is currently using Xeljanz should speak with their doctor about terminating their prescription to avoid the dangerous Xeljanz side effects. Not only will they help you stop the drug, but they can also advise you on safe medication alternatives for your condition.

Unfortunately, some users of Xeljanz have developed cancer as a result of their medication use, including but not limited to lymphoma, melanoma, and lung cancer. Pfizer, already knowing the risk of the Xeljanz side effects, sold it to consumers anyway, causing many innocent individuals to develop and suffer from a life-threatening disease. Their reluctance to disclose the risk of their product is not just unethical, it is illegal, and we are here to help hold them accountable to the full extent of the law.

Call a Xeljanz Lawyer Today

If you took Xeljanz and developed Xeljanz side effects, including taking Xeljanz and Developing Blood Clots or cancer, contact Xeljanz Lawyer Timothy L. Miles today for a free case evaluation.

Timothy L. Miles

What You Need to Know About the Avaulta Mesh Lawsuit

7/25/2022

A surgical mesh used to treat pelvic organ prolapse, the Bard Avaulta vaginal mesh has been linked to a number of side effects, including infection, painful intercourse and pelvic pain. The FDA first alerted consumers to the transvaginal mesh complications in 2008 when it released a warning about problems with surgical mesh products, and has since found that women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse repair surgery with a transvaginal mesh have a higher risk of complications than those undergoing other surgical options. Since the release of the FDA warning regarding the products, several transvaginal mesh lawsuits have been filed, alleging that the manufacturer, C.R. Bard, failed to properly design the surgical mesh and neglected to adequately inform patients and doctors of its risks. For more information, contact Avaulta Mesh Lawyer Timothy L. Miles today.

Transvaginal Mesh Side Effects: FDA Warning

In July 2011, the FDA announced that the transvaginal placement of surgical mesh, such as the Avaulta Plus, Avaulta Solo or Avaulta Biosynthetic, can put patients at a greater risk for mesh complications than other surgical options. This was not the FDA's first announcement regarding vaginal mesh complications, as the agency had previously released a public health notification concerning the risks associated with the transvaginal placement of surgical mesh used to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.
In October 2008, the FDA issued a warning, which stated that patients implanted with transvaginal mesh products, including the Avaulta surgical mesh, were at risk for serious complications. At this point, the FDA received more than 1000 reports of surgical mesh complications, including:

Infection
Pain (including pain during sex)
Bowel, bladder and blood vessel perforation
Vaginal scarring
Mesh erosion
Internal bleeding
Urinary problems

Other side effects of the Avaulta transvaginal mesh include deformation of vaginal tissues, pelvic pain, rectal problems and permanent nerve damage. These Avaulta mesh side effects may be treated by completely or partially removing the surgical mesh with the return of pelvic organ prolapse, a condition which the product is intended to treat. Bladder stents, colostomies and pelvic reconstruction are among the other available treatments for Avaulta mesh complications.

Avaulta Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Avaulta vaginal mesh complications can cause permanent physical damage and deformities. In addition to physical pain from the surgical mesh side effects and corrective surgeries, women may also experience self-esteem and psychological issues due to the Avaulta mesh complications. Patients who are experiencing problems with the Bard Avaulta vaginal sling may be able to participate in a transvaginal mesh lawsuit to recover financial compensation.

Several transvaginal mesh lawsuits have already been filed, alleging that the surgical device can cause serious complications, including mesh erosion through the vaginal wall. If you or a loved one has experienced Avaulta vaginal mesh problems, contact us today for a free case evaluation.

Call an Avaulta Mesh Lawyer Today

If you or a loved have experienced transvaginal mesh side effects or complications with the Avaulta vaginal sling, contact Avaulta Mesh Lawyer Timothy L. Miles today for a free case evaluation.

Timothy L. Miles

What You Need to Know About the Ethicon Surgical Staples Lawsuit

7/25/2022

You may be eligible to file an Ethicon surgical staples lawsuit for the defective product. In October 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) initiated a Class 1 recall—its most serious type of recall—of Ethicon surgical staplers. According to the federal agency, the device fails to properly form staples which can increase the risk of surgical complications.

There have reportedly been several injuries caused by Ethicon surgical stapler complications and even one death. Call Timothy L. Miles, an Ethicon Recall Lawyer, and see if you meet the criteria for a Ethicon surgical stapler lawsuit.

There have been numerous recalls of surgical staplers over the years, proving just how risky they are to use. In May 2013, Ethicon, a subdivision of drug giant Johnson & Johnson, issued a Class-II recall for surgical staples sold under the name Echelon. Echelon staples were used in a number of different types of surgery, including stomach stapling surgery. The recall states that Echelon staples used in stomach stapling had been reported to misfire and break, risking serious complications.

On Oct. 30, 2019, the FDA announced the Class 1 recall of Ethicon’s Echelon Flex Endopath staplers. The FDA recall, initiated by the Johnson & Johnson subsidiary earlier in October, includes a variety of products, such as the following:

ECHELON Flex 60 Endopath Stapler, Articulating Endoscopic Linear Cutter (EC60A)
ECHELON Flex 60 Powered Plus Compact Articulating Endoscopic Linear Cutter (PCEE60A)
ECHELON Flex 60 Powered Plus Articulating Endoscopic Linear Cutter, 44cm Shaft Length (PLEE60A)
ECHELON Flex 60 Powered Plus Articulating Endoscopic Linear Cutter, 34cm Shaft Length (PSEE60A)

These single-user staplers were designed to be used on internal tissue during minimally invasive gynecologic, urologic, thoracic, pediatric, and general surgeries.

According to the FDA, these devices may contain a component that is out of specification—leading to malformed staples. Malformed staples could lead to serious surgical complications.Two patients were reportedly injured by the staple devices when a misfire lead to their rectums being cut. As of Oct. 3, Ethicon has reportedly received seven reports of serious injuries and one report of death.

Symptoms of Surgical Complications. In general, surgical staples can lead to surgical complications such as:

Infections
Improper placement
Poor wound healing
Wound reopening
Allergic reactions

The FDA warns that the recalled Ethicon surgical staplers could be associated with more serious risks and complications.

Malformed staples that are not recognized or addressed could lead to:
Prolonged surgery
Leaking from the surgical incision
Hemorrhaging/major catastrophic internal bleeding
Hemorrhagic shock
Sepsis
Bowel leakage
Fistula formation
Additional surgeries
Death

These surgical stapler complications may be more common than reported. A 2020 review found that stapler malfunctions occur in between 0.022% and 2.3% of cases, according to observational studies. In contrast, a survey found that 86% of laparoscopic surgeons – who commonly use surgical staplers – either experienced or knew surgeons who experienced these malfunctions.

In addition to underreporting, surgical stapler manufacturers may have hidden complication reports in a hidden FDA database, according to Kaiser Health News. As a result, it may be hard for patients to know if they’re at risk for surgical stapler complications.
Despite past reporting concerns, the FDA officially reclassified surgical staplers as Class II devices in October 2021. This reclassification subjects internal surgical staplers to additional premarket reviews and more stringent approval requirements.

Patients are at risk of surgical stapler complications if they have undergone surgery that involved internal staples. Unfortunately, it may be difficult or impossible for patients to figure out which staples were used in their surgery and if they are affected by the recall.

If you had internal staples put in during surgery which later needed corrective surgery to fix, you may be affected by the recalled products and may meet the Ethicon lawsuit criteria.

An experienced medical device attorney such as Ethicon Recall Lawyer Timothy L. Miles can help you determine if or your loved one was affected by the Ethicon surgical stapler recall and determine meet the Ethicon lawsuit criteria. Fill out the form on this page to learn more about a free case evaluation by a Ethicon Recall Attorney.

Consumers who were affected by the defective staplers may be able to take legal action through an Ethicon surgical stapler lawsuit. These surgical staples lawsuits can help hold Ethicon and parent company Johnson & Johnson accountable for selling allegedly defective products. Ethicon has faced similar claims in the past due to other recalled surgery staple products. Settlements in similar lawsuits with Medtronic and other companies have resulted in deals worth between $5 million and $80 million.

If you needed corrective surgery due to complications from staples in surgery, you probably meet the Ethicon lawsuit criteria, so contact an Ethicon Recall Lawyer Timothy L. Miles today at 855/846-6529 or submitting the form below and see if you qualify for an Ethicon Surgical Staples Lawsuit.

Timothy L. Miles

Timothy L. Miles is a nationally recognized shareholder rights attorney raised in Nashville, Tennessee. Mr. Miles was recentely selected by Martindale-Hubbell® and ALM as a 2022 Top Ranked Lawyer, 2022 Top Rated Litigator. and a 2022 Elite Lawyer of the South. Mr. Miles also maintains the AV Preeminent Rating by Martindale-Hubbell®, their highest rating for both legal ability and ethics. Mr. Miles is a member of the prestigious Top 100 Civil Plaintiff Trial Lawyers: The National Trial Lawyers Association, a superb rated attorney by Avvo, a recipient of the Lifetime Achievement Award by Premier Lawyers of America (2019) and recognized as a Distinguished Lawyer, Recognizing Excellence in Securities Law, by Lawyers of Distinction (2019). Mr. Miles has published over sixty articles on various issues of the law, including class actions, whistleblower cases, products liability, and more.

What You Should Know About the ParaGard IUD Removal Side Effects Lawsuit

7/24/2022

The ParaGard is manufactured by Teva Pharmaceuticals and has been around since the late 1980s. An intrauterine device (IUD) is a small plastic T-shaped device used for birth control. It is inserted into the uterus where it stays to prevent pregnancy. It's a small piece of flexible plastic shaped like a T. Sometimes it is called an IUC — intrauterine contraception. The Paragard IUD device has a specially designed copper coil connected to a plastic base. The device is implanted in a women's uterine cavity. Some people who have used ParaGard IUD birth control have complained that they suffered significant and unexpected ParaGard IUD removal complications when attempting to have the birth control device removed. Read on for more information.

How Does the ParaGard IUD Work?

ParaGard works using just 1 simple active ingredient which is copper. Paragard works by preventing the sperm from reaching and fertilizing the egg and may also prevent implantation. However, because ParaGard is hormone free, it will not prevent your natural menstrual cycle or stop you from ovulating each month. At first, periods may become heavier and longer with spotting in between.

Broken IUD Causes

Serious production defects have led to broken IUDs, with the breakage occurring either during the implantation process or during removal. According to ongoing ParaGard IUD lawsuits, Teva was aware of the potential breakage that could occur from the defective IUDs during implantation and removal.

ParaGard Removal Side Effects

Some typical ParaGard removal side effects include light bleeding between periods, cramping, pain, and heavy bleeding during periods. Several ParaGard IUD users have reported that the device can also reportedly break during removal, leaving part of the device embedded in the uterus, according to a report published in the Open Journal of Clinical & Medical Case Reports. Some of the complications caused by a broken or fractured IUD, or other ParaGard removal side effects, include:

Broken pieces getting lodged in the uterine cavity
Uterine infection
Pain, cramps, and/or bleeding
Perforation of the IUD through the wall of the uterus
Broken pieces migrating to other organs

If breakage occurs, it may require that the device be removed with serious invasive treatments such as surgery to remove any leftover pieces and total hysterectomy, which may result in infertility issues for those affected. IUDs should be removed when they expire (they typically last from 3 to 10 years), when the user wants to get pregnant, or after experiencing side effects. Some typical ParaGard removal side effects include light bleeding between periods, cramping, pain, and heavy bleeding during periods. Several ParaGard IUD users have reported that the device can also reportedly break during removal, leaving part of the device embedded in the uterus, according to a report published in the Open Journal of Clinical & Medical Case Reports. Some of the complications caused by a broken or fractured IUD, or other ParaGard removal side effects, include:

Broken pieces getting lodged in the uterine cavity
Uterine infection
Pain, cramps, and/or bleeding
Perforation of the IUD through the wall of the uterus
Broken pieces migrating to other organs

Call a ParaGard IUD Removal Lawyer Today if You Suffered ParaGard Removal Side Effects

If you or a loved one experienced serious ParaGard removal side effects, contact Paraguard IUD Removal Lawyer Timothy L. Miles today at 855/846-6529, as you may be entitled to substantial compensation. Give us a call, it is free, and see what a Paraguard IUD Removal Lawyer can do for you and if your eligible for a ParaGard IUD Removal Side Effects Lawsuit.

Timothy L. Miles

Answers to 5 Whistleblower FAQ You Need to Know

7/23/2022

A whistleblower is anyone who has and reports insider knowledge of illegal activities occurring in an organization. Whistleblowers can be employees, suppliers, contractors, clients, or any individual who becomes aware of illegal business activities. If you have knowledge of a person or company attempting to defraud the federal government, and you come forward with this information, you could be receive a whistleblower award for your courage and blowing the whistle by filing a Whistleblower Lawsuit. Contact Nashville Whistleblower Attorney Timothy L. Miles today for a free case evaluation. Read on, below are answers to five frequently asked questions in whistleblower lawsuits.

What Is the False Claims Act?

The False Claims Act (FCA) makes it illegal for any person or institution to intentionally file a false claim or create a false record regarding any federally funded program. In this case, “intentionally” includes acting with reckless disregard, which is when someone blatantly ignores the potential consequences their actions may bring. The “qui tam” provision of the FCA allows private citizens who have evidence of fraud to file a lawsuit against the at-fault party on behalf of the government.

Can a Whistleblower Be Fired?

Whistleblowers are granted protections from retaliation under the FCA, including demotion, termination, suspension, denial of benefits, and any other retaliatory behavior. If an unethical organization attempts to retaliate against you despite these protections, you can file a lawsuit against them and recover the damages their actions have caused.

However, it is important to act quickly if you do experience retaliation. Time is of the essence in these situations, and you’ll need to prove that you were fired as a result of the qui tam lawsuit you were a part of. Waiting to file a whistleblower lawsuit can make your case weaker and potentially cause you to lose it altogether, so it is important to speak with a qualified whistleblower attorney.

What Is Fraud?

In qui tam lawsuits, fraud is defined as the intentional, significant misuse or theft of taxpayer funding. It also includes the misrepresentation of goods or services with the intent to earn unwarranted compensation, which can occur when companies bill the government for unperformed services. Fraud can be committed by a single individual or an entire organization, but the victim is always the innocent taxpayer who assumes their hard-earned money is going toward its intended purpose.

What Constitutes as a Whistleblower Lawsuit?

If you have evidence of an individual or organization deliberately attempting to defraud the government of funding, you may have grounds for a whistleblower lawsuit. However, not all evidence is created equal, and you may not know if your information is sufficient enough to warrant a lawsuit. If you are unsure about your eligibility, please speak with a whistleblower attorney for further opinion and advice on how to proceed.

Do You Need Evidence to Be a Whistleblower?

Yes, you will need strong supporting evidence to file a qui tam lawsuit. The evidence you collect must clearly display the entity committing the fraud, the amount stolen, and any other relevant information pertaining to the crime at hand. Many whistleblowers have collected financial statements, emails, and memorandums, but others have taken an extra step and used a personal recording device to collect evidence. While this is not necessary in all cases, it is important to collect as much evidence as you can to ensure that your case can help expose the corruption.

Conclusion

If you are thinking about blowing the whistle, contact Nashville whistleblower attorney Timothy L. Miles for a confidential and free case evaluation. Call today and see what a Nashville Whistleblower attorney can do for you.

Timothy L. Miles

4 Things You Need to Know About Qui Tam Lawsuits

7/22/2022

What Does “Qui Tam” Mean?

“Qui tam” is a shortened Latin phrase meaning “who as well for the king as for himself sues in the manner.” In other words, it means that an individual is filing a lawsuit on behalf of their government. The qui tam provision of the FCA was enacted not only to encourage whistleblowers but also to protect them from any retaliation by the hands of the organization they are helping to expose.

What Is a Qui Tam Lawyer?

A qui tam lawyer is an attorney who specializes in whistleblower lawsuits. This type of litigation allows private citizens to file a lawsuit on behalf of the government against an individual or organization who’s committing fraud within our nation’s federally funded programs.

Do You Need Evidence to Be a Whistleblower?

Can You Remain Anonymous as a Whistleblower?

The False Claims Act requires that qui tam lawsuits are kept “under seal” while the case is under investigation. This means that anyone other than the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. attorney, the whistleblower attorney and the assigned judge of the District Court cannot view the details of your case until the case becomes unsealed. If you have any concerns about your anonymity during this process, it is a good idea to speak with a whistleblower attorney and learn more about the laws that will affect your case.

Conclusion

If you are considering blowing the whistle and filing a qui tam lawsuit, contact Nashville whistleblower attorney Timothy L. Miles today for a confidential and free case evaluation.

Timothy L. Miles

The 3 Reasons We Need Whistleblowers

7/22/2022

Whistleblowing and whistleblower lawsuits are among the most important to make sure organizations are acting in our best interests. However, it is also something we do not see enough of. There are many examples of people coming forward to report on injustices or illegal activities happening within their organization. The risks for whistleblowers can be high, however. Many people fear losing their jobs in retaliation if they come forward as a whistleblower, which is why there are not as many of them as there should be. Here are three reasons why we need more whistleblowers and how you can become one if you are not ready to do so publicly just yet.

We Need Whistleblowers to Hold Big Organizations Accountable

The media has an important role to play in holding power accountable, but it is not a substitute for blowing the whistle. Journalists have limited resources and have to cover multiple stories at once, which means it takes time for them to break a story, let alone follow up on it and report. Whistleblowers, on the other hand, can expose wrongdoing and make corrections happen much more quickly. People who work within organizations can see and hear things that are happening, such as violations of policies or laws, misuse of resources, illegal activities and or other problems. They can report on these things promptly, possibly stopping the wrongdoing from getting worse or exposing it before it happens, or if government funds are being wasted or fraudulently taken, file a qui tam lawsuit.

Whistleblowers Can Prevent Dark Practices from Becoming Industry Standards

Many people do not want to be whistleblowers, but they still want to try to stop the spread of dark practices. You can do this by speaking out within the organization whenever you see something that violates your organization’s values or is just bad or unethical practices. If you see something happening and it is not necessary, let your supervisor or the person in charge of the area know. These kinds of small acts can help keep dark practices from becoming standard. And if you see something that needs to be addressed but no one else is saying anything about it, you can speak up. You can calmly bring up the issue and ask for a correction, while also being prepared to push back if the person in charge does not correct it. You may not always be successful, but you are doing your part to keep dark practices from becoming the industry standard.

Whistleblowing Is a Way to Protect the Public

You may not think of your profession as having anything to do with protecting the public, but many professions have a responsibility to do so. For example, doctors and other medical professionals have to report on doctors who are not keeping patients safe and following the standards of care. The same with lawyers. Professionals who design and build infrastructure, as well as those who construct, maintain, and fly airplanes have to report on practices that violate federal or local laws, are not safe, or waste resources. Personnel in other fields may have a responsibility to report on violations of ethical standards. For example, psychologists and other mental health professionals have a duty to report if a colleague appears to be a danger to clients or is otherwise unfit to practice. Similarly, lawyers have to report if a colleague commits misconduct, such as committing an ethical violation or withholding information that they are ethically required to share with their client.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the biggest reason we need more whistleblowers is to protect society and make sure every person has a fair shot, including those who decide to blow the whistle. You may be thinking that the problems you see are not as bad as what other whistleblowers have exposed. But regardless, whatever your reasons are for coming forward, remember that you can do so anonymously and speak with a qualified whistleblower attorney. Whistleblowers have played an important role in our society for centuries. These individuals have helped society progress by shedding light on corruption and abuses of power in government and big organizations. We need more whistleblowers today so that we can keep making progress in stopping illegal or immoral corporate activities. This is precisely why Congress enacted very strict protections for whistleblowers and provided for whistleblower awards for these brave individuals coming forward. If you are ready to blow the whistleblower attorney, contact a Nashville whistleblower attorney today.

Timothy L. Miles

Thinking of Blowing the Whistle? Here Are a Few Incentives

7/15/2022

Recognizing the risks whistleblowers take in coming forward and the resulting stress, Congress established a reward system which allows them to receive a portion of the government’s recovery. Eligibility for an award differs with each program. Below is the reward system under the various whistleblower programs.

FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT

Whistleblowers are generally entitled to between 15 percent to 30 percent of the government’s recovery under the FCA. Under the FCA, the minimum and maximum award is dictated on whether the government intervenes in the case. If so, the whistleblower is generally entitled to no less than 15 percent and no greater than 30 percent of the government’s recovery. If the government declines intervention, the whistleblower is entitled to no less than 25 percent and no more than 30 of the recovery by the government.

SEC WHISTLEBLOWER PROGRAM

The whistleblower is not entitled to a reward unless the SEC recovers more the $1 million. If the SEC recovers more than $1 million as a result of original information properly submitted by a whistleblower, the whistleblower is generally entitled to no less than 10 percent and no more than 30 percent of the recovery. If there are additional recoveries in certain related actions, such as a civil or criminal proceeding brought by the U.S. Department of Justice, the whistleblower may be entitled to a percentage of such recoveries, as well. The amount of a whistleblower’s award under the SEC Whistleblower Program depends on a variety of factors, including the significance of the whistleblower’s information, the degree of the whistleblower’s assistance, and the SEC’s interest in deterring future misconduct and encouraging whistleblowers to come forward.

THE CFTC WHISTLEBLOWER PROGRAM

Like the SEC program, if the CFTC recovers more than $ 1 million as a result of original information properly submitted by a whistleblower, the whistleblower is entitled to between 10 percent and 30 percent of the recovery. Whistleblowers may also be entitled to a percentage of the recoveries made in certain related actions, for example as the U.S. DOJ civil or criminal proceedings. The criteria for setting the award are similar to that in the SEC Whistleblower Program, and includes the significance of the whistleblower’s information, the degree of the whistleblower’s assistance, and the CFTC’s program goals of deterring future wrongdoing and encouraging whistleblower’s to come forward.

THE IRS WHISTLEBLOWER PROGRAM

Under the IRS Whistleblower Program, if a whistleblower reports underpayment of taxes that exceeds $2 million, including penalties and interest, and meets the other program requirements, the whistleblower is entitled to between 15 percent to 30 percent of the amount the IRS recovers based on that information. If the case deals with an individual, the individual’s annual gross income must exceed $200,000 for the whistleblower to be eligible for an award.

Timothy L. Miles, Esq.

Has Anyone Died on a One-Wheel?

Can you Be Injured While Using a One-Wheel skateboard if it Powers Off?

Is the One-Wheel Safe to Use?

Contact a Skateboard Lawyer Today

Timothy L. Miles, Esq.

Is There a Link Between Parkinson’s Disease and Frequent Exposure to Paraquat or Long Term Exposue to Paraquat?

What is the Scientific Link that Long Term Exposure to Paraquat Can Lead to Parkinson's?

​Do I Qualify for a Paraquat Exposure Lawsuit?

​Call a Paraquat Exposure Lawyer Today

Timothy L. Miles

Which Products Are Being Recalled?

Why Are Baby Loungers Dangerous?

Call a Bobby Pillow Lawyer Today

Timothy L. Miles, Esq.

How Dangerous Is Xeljanz?

How Long Can You Stay on Xeljanz?

Call a Xeljanz Lawyer Today

Timothy L. Miles

Transvaginal Mesh Side Effects: FDA Warning

Avaulta Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Call an Avaulta Mesh Lawyer Today

Timothy L. Miles

How Does the ParaGard IUD Work?

Broken IUD Causes

ParaGard Removal Side Effects

Call a ParaGard IUD Removal Lawyer Today if You Suffered ParaGard Removal Side Effects

Timothy L. Miles

What Is the False Claims Act?

Can a Whistleblower Be Fired?

What Is Fraud?

What Constitutes as a Whistleblower Lawsuit?

Do You Need Evidence to Be a Whistleblower?

Conclusion

Timothy L. Miles

What Does “Qui Tam” Mean?

What Is a Qui Tam Lawyer?

Do You Need Evidence to Be a Whistleblower?

Can You Remain Anonymous as a Whistleblower?

Conclusion

Timothy L. Miles

We Need Whistleblowers to Hold Big Organizations Accountable

Whistleblowers Can Prevent Dark Practices from Becoming Industry Standards

Whistleblowing Is a Way to Protect the Public

Conclusion

Timothy L. Miles

FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT

SEC WHISTLEBLOWER PROGRAM

THE CFTC WHISTLEBLOWER PROGRAM

THE IRS WHISTLEBLOWER PROGRAM

FIRREA/FIAFEA WHISTLEBLOWER ACTIONS

Do I Qualify for a Paraquat Exposure Lawsuit?

Call a Paraquat Exposure Lawyer Today